<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is The Hype Over GTD Still Going Strong?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/03/12/is-the-hype-over-gtd-still-going-strong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/03/12/is-the-hype-over-gtd-still-going-strong/</link>
	<description>Work smart, play smart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:38:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LJ</title>
		<link>http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/03/12/is-the-hype-over-gtd-still-going-strong/comment-page-1/#comment-21977</link>
		<dc:creator>LJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/03/12/is-the-hype-over-gtd-still-going-strong/#comment-21977</guid>
		<description>Reading the Yahoo groups devoted to both GTD and Do It Tomorrow, there are lots of comments about applying GTD - good and bad. What I have noticed is that a lot of people expect GTD to be an out-of-the-box solution, but it doesn&#039;t fit everyone or every situation. I personally use GTD for my work with a perfect, seamless fit; but my personal life is ruled by DIT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading the Yahoo groups devoted to both GTD and Do It Tomorrow, there are lots of comments about applying GTD &#8211; good and bad. What I have noticed is that a lot of people expect GTD to be an out-of-the-box solution, but it doesn&#8217;t fit everyone or every situation. I personally use GTD for my work with a perfect, seamless fit; but my personal life is ruled by DIT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/03/12/is-the-hype-over-gtd-still-going-strong/comment-page-1/#comment-21960</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/03/12/is-the-hype-over-gtd-still-going-strong/#comment-21960</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments as ever.

Jarod, you are right about Allen offering his services in a niche area. He never (as far as I am aware) claimed GTD was for everybody. It was everybody else who assumed it was.

Summy, I look forward to reading your continuing thoughts on GTD 2.0!

Rolf, as ever you have pointed me to something interesting. Maybe I will have to write about Shuhari too in the near future too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments as ever.</p>
<p>Jarod, you are right about Allen offering his services in a niche area. He never (as far as I am aware) claimed GTD was for everybody. It was everybody else who assumed it was.</p>
<p>Summy, I look forward to reading your continuing thoughts on GTD 2.0!</p>
<p>Rolf, as ever you have pointed me to something interesting. Maybe I will have to write about Shuhari too in the near future too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolf Katzenberger</title>
		<link>http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/03/12/is-the-hype-over-gtd-still-going-strong/comment-page-1/#comment-21951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolf Katzenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/03/12/is-the-hype-over-gtd-still-going-strong/#comment-21951</guid>
		<description>The hype cycle concept matches the public image of a technology. In terms of personal involvement, it is mirrored quite well by the old concept of learning according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shu_ha_ri&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Shuhari&lt;/a&gt;:

Shu, &quot;learning fundamentals, techniques, heuristics, proverbs&quot; means that you learn the techniques you&#039;ve got to know; maybe you&#039;re mistaken to believe that techniques are already the solution (peak of inflated expectations).

Ha, &quot;finding exceptions to traditional wisdom, reflecting on their truth, finding new ways, techniques, and proverbs&quot; means that you&#039;re struggling with situations where the mere application of techniques obviously doesn&#039;t work (trough of disillusionment).

Ri, &quot;there are no techniques or proverbs, all moves are natural&quot; means that you&#039;ve developed a deeper understanding about what you&#039;ve learned so far (plateau of productivity). I think having a mind like water is a nice alternative wording for this state.

Observing my own learning in various fields, I notice that I need to go through all states, there is no shortcut. Probably, the predominant culture isn&#039;t willing to accept that sowing and harvesting is a much better metaphor for learning than a quick fix is. Which makes a nice link between GTD and Covey&#039;s 7 Habits, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hype cycle concept matches the public image of a technology. In terms of personal involvement, it is mirrored quite well by the old concept of learning according to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shu_ha_ri" rel="nofollow">Shuhari</a>:</p>
<p>Shu, &#8220;learning fundamentals, techniques, heuristics, proverbs&#8221; means that you learn the techniques you&#8217;ve got to know; maybe you&#8217;re mistaken to believe that techniques are already the solution (peak of inflated expectations).</p>
<p>Ha, &#8220;finding exceptions to traditional wisdom, reflecting on their truth, finding new ways, techniques, and proverbs&#8221; means that you&#8217;re struggling with situations where the mere application of techniques obviously doesn&#8217;t work (trough of disillusionment).</p>
<p>Ri, &#8220;there are no techniques or proverbs, all moves are natural&#8221; means that you&#8217;ve developed a deeper understanding about what you&#8217;ve learned so far (plateau of productivity). I think having a mind like water is a nice alternative wording for this state.</p>
<p>Observing my own learning in various fields, I notice that I need to go through all states, there is no shortcut. Probably, the predominant culture isn&#8217;t willing to accept that sowing and harvesting is a much better metaphor for learning than a quick fix is. Which makes a nice link between GTD and Covey&#8217;s 7 Habits, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summy</title>
		<link>http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/03/12/is-the-hype-over-gtd-still-going-strong/comment-page-1/#comment-21945</link>
		<dc:creator>Summy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/03/12/is-the-hype-over-gtd-still-going-strong/#comment-21945</guid>
		<description>People need to expand GTD to fit their needs. GTD is very useful but everyone agrees it&#039;s not perfect. I&#039;m trying to put together a GTD 2.0 at my site. Then once that&#039;s settled someone will come up with a GTD 3.0. To be more productive we need to keep refining our systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People need to expand GTD to fit their needs. GTD is very useful but everyone agrees it&#8217;s not perfect. I&#8217;m trying to put together a GTD 2.0 at my site. Then once that&#8217;s settled someone will come up with a GTD 3.0. To be more productive we need to keep refining our systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarod</title>
		<link>http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/03/12/is-the-hype-over-gtd-still-going-strong/comment-page-1/#comment-21944</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/03/12/is-the-hype-over-gtd-still-going-strong/#comment-21944</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m not mistaken, didn&#039;t Allen say in his book that GTD didn&#039;t offer all of the answers but rather some solutions to common problems?

I&#039;m speaking in a general sense here when I say this - when people criticize GTD for not solving their problems, I think that they&#039;re missing the point. Anybody that says that their productivity system can solve everybody&#039;s problems all the time is an outright liar.

Allen is being very smart by offering his services in a niche area of productivity. I can&#039;t fault the guy. GTD hasn&#039;t solved all of my problems though it has definitely helped me out tremendously. I&#039;ve used the ideas that work and discarded the rest. It&#039;s best if implemented with other ideas/systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken, didn&#8217;t Allen say in his book that GTD didn&#8217;t offer all of the answers but rather some solutions to common problems?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m speaking in a general sense here when I say this &#8211; when people criticize GTD for not solving their problems, I think that they&#8217;re missing the point. Anybody that says that their productivity system can solve everybody&#8217;s problems all the time is an outright liar.</p>
<p>Allen is being very smart by offering his services in a niche area of productivity. I can&#8217;t fault the guy. GTD hasn&#8217;t solved all of my problems though it has definitely helped me out tremendously. I&#8217;ve used the ideas that work and discarded the rest. It&#8217;s best if implemented with other ideas/systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
