The Art Of Time Management: How To Be Efficient

October 6th 2008   Productivity   6 comments

Good time management involves being both effective and efficient. You have to be able to pick out the right tasks and then do them in the most economical way. In the first part of this series I looked at effectiveness. As I discussed then, that is certainly the most important stage. However it also needs to be tied with efficient work practices to really save you time. It’s no good deciding you’re going to write that life changing book you’ve always wanted to do if you are going to procrastinate all the time. Likewise, focusing on preparations for a big work conference is all well and good but if you’re not breaking the workload down into manageable chunks you’re going to be wasting time.

Unlike effectiveness, there are many, many ways of being efficient. In fact this is pretty much what productivity is (was?) all about. Much of GTD covered how to get work done in the most economical way possible. However, that was also its achilles heel. As Tim Ferriss (of Four Hour Work Week fame) said, doing something unimportant well does not make it important. Trying to detail the hundreds of productivity hacks and good work habits out there in one post is a pretty pointless endeavor so instead I’m going to discuss what I believe is the top fundamental tip for being more efficient.

In the previous post I mentioned Tim Ferriss and how he recommends using the Pareto principle to more effectively choose the right tasks to work on. To complement this, he also encourages people to use Parkinson’s law to become more efficient. In basic terms the law states that work expands to fill the time alloted to it. This typically means that you will idle along at a casual pace because you have so much time available or doing more than is necessary and complicating your work to fill up the time. Thankfully, by some proactive manipulation, Parkinson’s law can be turned to your advantage. Bring deadlines forward or wait till you are nearer to the deadline before starting the project. Speaking of the latter, while I would never encourage somebody to leave work till the last minute, understanding the difference between whether you want, should or need do something will really help you create an happy balance.

If you want more ideas be sure to check out the archive and visit my list of other productivity blogs. On Wednesday I will describe my own personal experiences on becoming more efficient and effective so be sure to keep an eye out for it (you can also subscribe to make sure you don’t miss it).

Related Posts

Subscribe by email to get the latest posts:

What next?

Submit to Reddit
Stumbleupon
Digg it!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark it
Subscribe to feed

Reader discussion

Agree with you. My best work is usually done closer to the deadline. The impending date seems to get me really focused and interested in the project. But that can backfire on you if you wait too long, and something happens to interrupt your plans.

When the question of effective and efficiency arise, I am always reminded of the metaphor of a ladder leaning up against a building. Efficiency is about climbing the ladder as quickly as you can. However, there are people who climb the ladder quickly only to get to the top and realize the ladder is leaning up against the wrong building.

Nice metaphor Kell, sums up my these points nicely. We need effectiveness to make sure we are always going in the right direction. It’s like adjusting the sails of a ship as the wind changes.

One thing to remember is that as efficient as you as an individual, if you’re in a collaborative project you can only go as fast as the lowest common denominator. I’m experiencing this now with some analysts that want to confirm, reconfirm, revisit and ensure that things are correct. They are obviously either dense or being lazy, but I can’t do much to work faster than them when there are dependencies.

Good point Randy, certainly worth considering.

Trackbacks

Leave a Reply