<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Little Idea For Improving Your Life 100%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/12/15/a-little-idea-for-improving-your-life-100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/12/15/a-little-idea-for-improving-your-life-100/</link>
	<description>One of the longest running and most respected productivity blogs on the net!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:02:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike King</title>
		<link>http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/12/15/a-little-idea-for-improving-your-life-100/comment-page-1/#comment-27694</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizeit.co.uk/?p=2167#comment-27694</guid>
		<description>Sure thing James.  I guess the wording of that one got away from you then, I assumed you meant something like that but could easily confuse some readers as often audacious goals are something promoted as a means to achieve great things.  

You are right in how the difficulty and complexity can increase the odds of failing.  For something like a big goal though, it&#039;s got to be based on a deep desire to ensure you can overcome those barriers.  Thanks for the clarification and discussion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure thing James.  I guess the wording of that one got away from you then, I assumed you meant something like that but could easily confuse some readers as often audacious goals are something promoted as a means to achieve great things.  </p>
<p>You are right in how the difficulty and complexity can increase the odds of failing.  For something like a big goal though, it&#8217;s got to be based on a deep desire to ensure you can overcome those barriers.  Thanks for the clarification and discussion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/12/15/a-little-idea-for-improving-your-life-100/comment-page-1/#comment-27693</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizeit.co.uk/?p=2167#comment-27693</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Mike. Perhaps it was a little extreme to suggest any big goal would automatically fail. However, I feel trying to focus on a large scale project - over something that has been broken down into smaller activities - will without doubt increase the difficulty and complexity, which in turn will increase the odds of you falling off the wagon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Mike. Perhaps it was a little extreme to suggest any big goal would automatically fail. However, I feel trying to focus on a large scale project &#8211; over something that has been broken down into smaller activities &#8211; will without doubt increase the difficulty and complexity, which in turn will increase the odds of you falling off the wagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike King</title>
		<link>http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/12/15/a-little-idea-for-improving-your-life-100/comment-page-1/#comment-27691</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 03:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizeit.co.uk/?p=2167#comment-27691</guid>
		<description>Logic and addition aside, I do see your point James.  The outline lists great small things to improve on and looking at many of those at a time is a great thing to do.  However, I&#039;m not sure why you think that one big goal is destined to fail?  If it&#039;s the right goal and an area of more passion and interest than a bunch of smaller ones, I&#039;d argue that it is much more worthwhile doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logic and addition aside, I do see your point James.  The outline lists great small things to improve on and looking at many of those at a time is a great thing to do.  However, I&#8217;m not sure why you think that one big goal is destined to fail?  If it&#8217;s the right goal and an area of more passion and interest than a bunch of smaller ones, I&#8217;d argue that it is much more worthwhile doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/12/15/a-little-idea-for-improving-your-life-100/comment-page-1/#comment-27677</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizeit.co.uk/?p=2167#comment-27677</guid>
		<description>Ok, you got me. Perhaps it is cheating but as I said, there is logic to my madness. Rather than putting 100% into one big goal that is destined to fail, break down your efforts into smaller goals. It&#039;s much easier to take small steps forward in all of those ten areas in your life than it is to do one (or more) huge goals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, you got me. Perhaps it is cheating but as I said, there is logic to my madness. Rather than putting 100% into one big goal that is destined to fail, break down your efforts into smaller goals. It&#8217;s much easier to take small steps forward in all of those ten areas in your life than it is to do one (or more) huge goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.organizeit.co.uk/2008/12/15/a-little-idea-for-improving-your-life-100/comment-page-1/#comment-27676</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizeit.co.uk/?p=2167#comment-27676</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t calculate percentages like that... its cheating. 10% of one thing plus 10% of nice other things will give you a 10% improvement not 100%. However, 10% better in everything is likely to make a big improvement over time, especially if you consider the compound nature of growth. You only have to give 10% extra each year for eight years to get 114% increase overall. If you keep doing that then you will get another 100% growth in four more years and so on (try a spreadsheet starting at 100 and adding 10% each year to see the benefits). Its all about consistently good growth over time... that should give real satisfaction that lasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t calculate percentages like that&#8230; its cheating. 10% of one thing plus 10% of nice other things will give you a 10% improvement not 100%. However, 10% better in everything is likely to make a big improvement over time, especially if you consider the compound nature of growth. You only have to give 10% extra each year for eight years to get 114% increase overall. If you keep doing that then you will get another 100% growth in four more years and so on (try a spreadsheet starting at 100 and adding 10% each year to see the benefits). Its all about consistently good growth over time&#8230; that should give real satisfaction that lasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

